编辑:sx_yangk
2015-02-11
在科研合作日益显著的趋势下,基于作者合作的学术影响力测度研究明显分为两方面,用合作这一因素对传统的引用影响力指标进行调整, 下面是编辑老师为大家准备的作者引用的学术影响力测度。
直接测度作者在合作网络中的影响力,并探索与引用影响力指标的相关性。结果表明,作者在合作网络中的中心度指标与其被引次数、h指数、g指数均呈正相关。在科研合作的背景下,要综合评价作者的学术影响力,应将两者结合起来。
(Institute of Medical information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005)
Abstract:Today, a move towards an increasing number of authors in the publication byline is widely acknowledged, leading to significant discussions between collaboration and academic impact assessment. These studies include two main aspects, one is to adjust scientists’ citation impact with co-authorship, the other is to measure authors’ impact in co-authorship network and examine the correlation between collaboration measurement and citation measurement indicators. The results showed that social network analysis and citation network analysis are complementary approaches to the study of scientific impact. Next, we investigated the theoretical basis for a double measurement of academic impact from the perspective of scientific communication.
编辑老师在此也特别为朋友们编辑整理了作者引用的学术影响力测度。
相关推荐:
标签:论文资讯
威廉希尔app (51edu.com)在建设过程中引用了互联网上的一些信息资源并对有明确来源的信息注明了出处,版权归原作者及原网站所有,如果您对本站信息资源版权的归属问题存有异议,请您致信qinquan#51edu.com(将#换成@),我们会立即做出答复并及时解决。如果您认为本站有侵犯您权益的行为,请通知我们,我们一定根据实际情况及时处理。