以下为威廉希尔app 为您编辑的大学英语教学中关于并列结构的研究，敬请关注!!

1.1 "meaning the relevant

“意义相关”表达了怎样的内容呢?如果说“Romeo and Juliet”是表达爱情故事的话,那么我们随便将两个人名并列在一起,如“Henry VIII andZhu Yuanzhang”呢?他们之间的“意义相关”又是什么呢?

Significance related expressed how? "Romeo and Juliet" is the expression of a love story, then we just tied the two names together, such as "Henry VIII andZhu Yuanzhang"? Their meaning related to "what is it? can be learned from the search engine Baidu: Henry VIII (Henry Ⅷ, from 1491 to 1547), the emperor Ming Zhu Yuanzhang (1328 to 1398) this information is that their significance related to what is it? try to guess, both names are historical figures, emperor, tyrant [7], and their significance really mean, which one do just historical figures? said the brutal character? If there is no context, no way of knowing. From the search engine Google can get the following results: Today in History: 1368 - Zhu Yuanzhang established the Ming Dynasty; 1368 - In a coronation ceremony, ZhuYuanzhang ascends to the throne of China as theHongwu Emperor, initiating Ming Dynasty ruleover China that would last for three centuries; 1510 - Henry VIII of England, then 18years old, appears incognito in the lists at Rich-mond, and is applauded for his jousting before hereveals his identity; 1533 - Anne Boleyn, second wife of HenryVIII of England, discovers herself pregnant [9]. these three historical events in the history of January 23, the emperor ascended the throne, Henry VIII anonymous participate in the duel, and the second wife of Henry VIII found himself on this day pregnant. Not established historical facts in this case side by side, you can see the two of the three events almost does not make sense, but only in addition to outside related to the date and time. "Henry VIII and the emperor put together their significance related uncertainty? If there is no certainty can not be said to be the meaning related. Visible, the so-called "meaning-related", also called "proximity" [9], referring to the establishment of the context (Context) related significance in the context established, there is no context to mention " The significance related "or" proximity ". Therefore, the meaning of the relevant "is a relative term, tied for whether the meaning of the relevant depending on the context, does not require particularly pointed out in the definition of side-by-side.

1.2 "same level"

对层次相同的解释,《教程》中列举了“词和词的并列”、“词组和词组的并列”、“分句和分句的并列”以及“并列句”。尽管词与词之间的并列是较为规范的并列关系,但在现实中词和词组之间的并列也不少见。笔者认为对词和词组的并列句分析要超越句法分析,不应该属于语法分析范围之内。

Interpretation of the same level, "Tutorial" cited the juxtaposition of words and words, phrases and phrases clauses, clauses tied "," side by side "and" compound ". Although the parallel between words is relatively standard parallel relationship, but in reality the parallel between the words and phrases are not uncommon. I believe that the compound sentence analysis to go beyond the syntactic analysis, should not fall within the scope of the parsing of words and phrases. Clinton, for example, when the story of his father, a survey conducted by MyLife book talked about 1993 Father's Day Washington Post said: "the The stories confirmedthe things my mother and I knew [10] (these stories prove me his mother and I know those crazy things.) here, "my mother" and "I" side-by-side, apparently the former is a phrase, which is the word, and they are two of the same side by side. Another example is "********": "Amalita hung up the phone andlaughed [11] 48" "She was wearing the white fake-furGucci Coat, black leather pants custom-made atNew York Leather ('They 're the last pair theymade in this leather-I had to Fight with ElleMacpherson over them.' she said), And sunglass-es. [11] 47 "in the previous sentence of two side-by-side-is a verb phrase, and the other is a single verb, they are side-by-side relationship. After a three parallel one: limited word + adjective + compound nouns + proper noun + noun structure; 2: adjective + noun + plural noun + post-modifier (synthetic past participle) + location adverbial + brackets explain parenthesis structure; 3: Special concise a word. What is more, the teaching of English writing in the sentence: "This means thatthe the Third student will describe WHO they are, w  herethey live, their family status, occupation, inter-ESTs, etc. before the Writing starts. [12 87 "side-by-side in the sentence is two clauses, a phrase and two nouns, and not side by side across the three levels of the clause, phrase and word" and "." etc "completely broken through the" the same level as the boundaries. The existence of the parallel entry shows the juxtaposition of words and words, phrases and phrases parallel boundaries is not a "parallel structure" inevitable requirement. Moreover, the analysis of the "compound" has exceeded the scope of the analysis of the "Syntax", and can not be parsed. Beyond the scope of analysis of the syntax analysis, can not explain any problems. Therefore, the so-called "level" only an ideal state, "the same level" are just some of the special phenomenon across levels parallel is there, and is a common phenomenon.The syntactic function What? Syntactic function is the role played by certain grammatical unit in the sentence, commonly referred to as what ingredients that subject, predicate, predicative, object, attribute, adverbial or complement. It appears from the parallel structure in practical, certain grammatical unit "syntactic function" is the only constant feature of the parallel structure. "Parallel structure" of the syntactic function of the grammatical unit is no longer the same, you really can not find is called parallel significance. , "Parallel structure" in two or more linguistic units the same syntactic function is the essential attribute of the parallel structure.

1.4 "coordinating conjunctions"

"Coordinating conjunctions" few and far between, it seems that they have a common understanding. "Coordinating conjunctions" many dictionary entries. The well-known Baidu Encyclopedia only explain the usage of "coordinating conjunctions". "Coordinating conjunctions (Coordinating conjunction) is used to indicate a parallel relationship, sect the relationship between cause and effect reasoning relations can also be used to connect to the parallel words, phrases or clauses. [13] This explanation is a bit confusing, even though English learners helpful to understand the meaning of "coordinating conjunctions" However, this interpretation is not explicitly mentioned in the "English", and are taken out of context type. Side by side is a compound represented by the conjunctions, coordinating conjunctions and subordinating conjunctions no difference. The ice English grammar put the coordinating conjunctions named "Li conjunctions, such as AND, OR, but, for, etc." [14] 426. "Deep English grammar" from the Semantic Studies (Semantics) opinion classifieds, coordinating conjunctions "translated as" conjunctions ". "Deep English grammar" down the definition of a "coordinating conjunctions": "the conjunction of two or more the same level of linguistic units (words, phrases, clauses, sentences) connected together known as the 'coordinating conjunctions'. [15] 43 "This has been dealt with in the" same level "side-by-side structure the same level as" not credible, "the same level of linguistic units" refers to the "same level" means, so this definition is not rigorous. Chinese Dictionary "coordinating conjunctions" entry, not only through the interpretation of the "tied" to infer the meaning of "coordinating conjunctions". The famous linguist Professor Lü, the DING sound editor of the "Modern Chinese Dictionary" (5th edition) "parallel" explanation is: "side by side paracytic, misplaced priorities" [16] 1627. "Coordinating conjunctions" is defined syntax that "side-by-side paracytic misplaced priorities" relationship conjunctions, belonging to the closed parts of speech. "Coordinating conjunctions" basic usage is a parallel relationship, Table affiliation is due to the presence of a variety of conditions or context, deliberately vague concept or misuse caused. More authoritative network Wiktionary explicitly define "coordinating conjunctions": the the same syntax significance of two or more languages units linked together conjunctions, can be linked to word, clause or sentence. ("Coordinating conjunctions, also called coordina-tors, are conjunctions that join two or more itemsof equal syntactic importance, such as words, main clauses, or sentences. [17]") This definition does not mention the vocabulary and phrases can not side by side. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary [10] pointed out that the coordinating conjunctions can link words and phrases (such as "now Orin the future"). "Tutorial" can also be seen from both explain some partial narrow understanding "parallel structure" of the "level". Currently accepted side by side the conjunctions only "and", "or" and "but". "Tutorial" think "three main coordinating conjunctions, ie, AND, or, but" in English. "Thin ice of English Grammar" and "tutorial" (1) put the "for" as coordinating conjunctions; deep English Grammar "" so "in coordinating conjunctions. Wikipedia dictionary lists "for", "and", "nor", "but", "or", "yet" and "so" coordinating conjunctions. "Longman English Grammar", said "We made it clear that 'and', 'or' and 'but'3 conjunctions coordinating conjunctions' and' and 'or' is the central coordinating conjunctions' but 'in some respects they are different. [19] 1269 "" coordinating conjunctions "and" subordinating conjunction "corresponding understanding of parallel and affiliation determines the amount of" coordinating conjunctions ". Was some conjunctions placed under a parallel relationship, others put the same conjunctions under the affiliation. Some parsing even put forward the concept of a Conjuncts "to more detailed areas of the coordinating conjunctions and subordinating conjunctions. Some parsing "nor", "yet" the words do other explanation, not as a coordinating conjunctions. Such a conclusion, sometimes with "coordinating conjunctions" slave link components can be expressed, some ingredients "subordinating conjunction" link at the same time can also be represented side by side, this "misuse" is often writers knowingly committed intentionally to fuzzy concept. Therefore, coordinating conjunctions "link components can be represented side by side depends on the context.

以上就是我们为您准备的大学英语教学中关于并列结构的研究，更多内容请点击威廉希尔app 。