三、真题连线

以2013年考研英语真题阅读理解Text 4 为例，该文章选自2012年6月25日The Wall Street Journal《华尔街日报》，可见其实效性。需要去读一些实效性非常强的西方报刊杂志上的文章。该文章主要讲了联邦政府与州政府之间就移民问题产生的分期。第一段用来自法院对政府权利的决定做引子，提出了对于移民法律实施的议题。第二段进一步解释了为什么法院会否定亚利桑那州的提案。在后文中解释了否定的原因，分析了州政府拥有的权利以及导致联邦失力的决议，从而得出为什么法官们会投对联邦政府不利的反对票。本文的难点在于理解法院的作用，这就需要考生们认真熟悉美国法律常识，因为一旦涉及美国法律的文章出现，势必会牵扯相关内容。

四、模拟练习

冲刺期间，模拟题也必须给力!下面是KK教授给出的一道涉及美国法律，同时接近真题的阅读题目：

The framers of America’s constitution knew nothing about mobile phones, but they knew a thing or two about unreasonable searches. In Riley vs California, the Supreme Courtconsidered“whether the police may, without a warrant, search digitalin formation on a cellphone seized from an individual who has been arrested.”Unanimously on June 25th, the justices said no, or, to be more precise, very rarely.

David Riley, a member of the Bloods street gang who was sentenced to15 years to life for attempted murder, and Brima Wurie, sentenced to 262 monthson a drug charge, will be happy to hear this. Except in true emergencies where searching a mobile phone could, say, avert a terrorist attack, police prying without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment’s bar on “unreasonable”searches, the justices decided. Since both Riley and Wurie’s convictions were based on evidence gleaned from such searches, they will be overturned.

The reason why the case of David has the possibility of being invalidated is that

A The evidence associated with his conviction violates the Fourth Amendment.

B The conviction will be overturned as justices decided in Riley vs California case.

C His charge of attempted murder is not based on true emergencies when police prying.

D The way to attain evidence isunconstitutional according to an unanimous decision.

【答案】D

通过今天的学习，相信各位考生对美国法律这个高频语料有了进一步的掌握，希望考生学习过后能勤总结、多练习，在做题中积极联想今天学到的知识。时间已然不多，努力才是王道。预祝各位考生都能取得自己满意的成绩!

以上是由威廉希尔app 为大家整理的2015年考研英语阅读理解热点，希望能够真真的帮助到大家，更多相关内容请关注威廉希尔app 考研频道。

相关推荐

2015年考研英语翻译考试技巧：锁定主旨句  

2015考研英语阅读理解高频词汇